How to calculate a 1D convolution summation?












2














I hope I said that right. I'm trying to follow along with a convolution example but maybe I am in over my head. I don't understand how in this example they get the values on the right. For example, I would think when n=0 the result would be 0*0 not 1*2.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question



























    2














    I hope I said that right. I'm trying to follow along with a convolution example but maybe I am in over my head. I don't understand how in this example they get the values on the right. For example, I would think when n=0 the result would be 0*0 not 1*2.



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2







      I hope I said that right. I'm trying to follow along with a convolution example but maybe I am in over my head. I don't understand how in this example they get the values on the right. For example, I would think when n=0 the result would be 0*0 not 1*2.



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question













      I hope I said that right. I'm trying to follow along with a convolution example but maybe I am in over my head. I don't understand how in this example they get the values on the right. For example, I would think when n=0 the result would be 0*0 not 1*2.



      enter image description here







      convolution






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Oct 10 '13 at 18:26









      user1873073

      1113




      1113






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Something you might want to watch if you are having trouble with the convolution of two signals is the animation at 34:00 or so from this lecture from MIT Open Courseware: here. The lecturer is Oppenheim, who co-wrote a classic book on discrete-time signal processing.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Wow that was cool thanks.
            – hellyale
            Nov 9 '15 at 6:21



















          0














          I got it.



          the 1 is x[0] and the 2 is h[0] which if you look at the impulse response h[0] is 2.
          the 3 is x[1] and the 2 is h[0]



          etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521715%2fhow-to-calculate-a-1d-convolution-summation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            Something you might want to watch if you are having trouble with the convolution of two signals is the animation at 34:00 or so from this lecture from MIT Open Courseware: here. The lecturer is Oppenheim, who co-wrote a classic book on discrete-time signal processing.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Wow that was cool thanks.
              – hellyale
              Nov 9 '15 at 6:21
















            2














            Something you might want to watch if you are having trouble with the convolution of two signals is the animation at 34:00 or so from this lecture from MIT Open Courseware: here. The lecturer is Oppenheim, who co-wrote a classic book on discrete-time signal processing.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Wow that was cool thanks.
              – hellyale
              Nov 9 '15 at 6:21














            2












            2








            2






            Something you might want to watch if you are having trouble with the convolution of two signals is the animation at 34:00 or so from this lecture from MIT Open Courseware: here. The lecturer is Oppenheim, who co-wrote a classic book on discrete-time signal processing.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Something you might want to watch if you are having trouble with the convolution of two signals is the animation at 34:00 or so from this lecture from MIT Open Courseware: here. The lecturer is Oppenheim, who co-wrote a classic book on discrete-time signal processing.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered May 28 '14 at 13:54









            RNG

            10310




            10310












            • Wow that was cool thanks.
              – hellyale
              Nov 9 '15 at 6:21


















            • Wow that was cool thanks.
              – hellyale
              Nov 9 '15 at 6:21
















            Wow that was cool thanks.
            – hellyale
            Nov 9 '15 at 6:21




            Wow that was cool thanks.
            – hellyale
            Nov 9 '15 at 6:21











            0














            I got it.



            the 1 is x[0] and the 2 is h[0] which if you look at the impulse response h[0] is 2.
            the 3 is x[1] and the 2 is h[0]



            etc.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              I got it.



              the 1 is x[0] and the 2 is h[0] which if you look at the impulse response h[0] is 2.
              the 3 is x[1] and the 2 is h[0]



              etc.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                I got it.



                the 1 is x[0] and the 2 is h[0] which if you look at the impulse response h[0] is 2.
                the 3 is x[1] and the 2 is h[0]



                etc.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                I got it.



                the 1 is x[0] and the 2 is h[0] which if you look at the impulse response h[0] is 2.
                the 3 is x[1] and the 2 is h[0]



                etc.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Oct 11 '13 at 17:13









                user1873073

                1113




                1113






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521715%2fhow-to-calculate-a-1d-convolution-summation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?