Graph of the function in the form: sqrt(-x+a) through manipulation of the function sqrt(x)?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In class we learned that certain simple functions $(x, x^2, sqrt x)$ etc. can be manipulated to easily find the graphs of more complicated versions of these original functions...
$f(x+1) Longrightarrow$ shift to the left/ $f(x-1)Longrightarrow$ shift to right, etc.



However, I'm having trouble applying that to the function:
$f(x) = sqrt{(-x+a)}.$

So far I understand this much:
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(-x)}$ results in reflection across $y-$axis.
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(xpm a)}$ results in shift of original graph a units to the left/right, respectively.



But when you apply the principles to $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ or $sqrt{(-x-a)},$ it doesn't respond appropriately. The graph I get for $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ is the graph of $sqrt{(-x)}$ shifted a units to the right , not the left.

And the opposite goes for $sqrt{(-x-a)}.$

Why is this? Can normal manipulation of the graph not be applied to functions of this form?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    $f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
    – zoli
    Oct 31 '15 at 23:53












  • Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 4:45















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In class we learned that certain simple functions $(x, x^2, sqrt x)$ etc. can be manipulated to easily find the graphs of more complicated versions of these original functions...
$f(x+1) Longrightarrow$ shift to the left/ $f(x-1)Longrightarrow$ shift to right, etc.



However, I'm having trouble applying that to the function:
$f(x) = sqrt{(-x+a)}.$

So far I understand this much:
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(-x)}$ results in reflection across $y-$axis.
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(xpm a)}$ results in shift of original graph a units to the left/right, respectively.



But when you apply the principles to $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ or $sqrt{(-x-a)},$ it doesn't respond appropriately. The graph I get for $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ is the graph of $sqrt{(-x)}$ shifted a units to the right , not the left.

And the opposite goes for $sqrt{(-x-a)}.$

Why is this? Can normal manipulation of the graph not be applied to functions of this form?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    $f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
    – zoli
    Oct 31 '15 at 23:53












  • Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 4:45













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In class we learned that certain simple functions $(x, x^2, sqrt x)$ etc. can be manipulated to easily find the graphs of more complicated versions of these original functions...
$f(x+1) Longrightarrow$ shift to the left/ $f(x-1)Longrightarrow$ shift to right, etc.



However, I'm having trouble applying that to the function:
$f(x) = sqrt{(-x+a)}.$

So far I understand this much:
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(-x)}$ results in reflection across $y-$axis.
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(xpm a)}$ results in shift of original graph a units to the left/right, respectively.



But when you apply the principles to $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ or $sqrt{(-x-a)},$ it doesn't respond appropriately. The graph I get for $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ is the graph of $sqrt{(-x)}$ shifted a units to the right , not the left.

And the opposite goes for $sqrt{(-x-a)}.$

Why is this? Can normal manipulation of the graph not be applied to functions of this form?










share|cite|improve this question















In class we learned that certain simple functions $(x, x^2, sqrt x)$ etc. can be manipulated to easily find the graphs of more complicated versions of these original functions...
$f(x+1) Longrightarrow$ shift to the left/ $f(x-1)Longrightarrow$ shift to right, etc.



However, I'm having trouble applying that to the function:
$f(x) = sqrt{(-x+a)}.$

So far I understand this much:
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(-x)}$ results in reflection across $y-$axis.
$sqrt x Longrightarrow sqrt{(xpm a)}$ results in shift of original graph a units to the left/right, respectively.



But when you apply the principles to $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ or $sqrt{(-x-a)},$ it doesn't respond appropriately. The graph I get for $sqrt{(-x+a)}$ is the graph of $sqrt{(-x)}$ shifted a units to the right , not the left.

And the opposite goes for $sqrt{(-x-a)}.$

Why is this? Can normal manipulation of the graph not be applied to functions of this form?







functions graphing-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 9:37









user376343

2,4581718




2,4581718










asked Oct 31 '15 at 23:46









RiddleMeThis

1




1








  • 3




    $f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
    – zoli
    Oct 31 '15 at 23:53












  • Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 4:45














  • 3




    $f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
    – zoli
    Oct 31 '15 at 23:53












  • Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 4:45








3




3




$f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
– zoli
Oct 31 '15 at 23:53






$f(-x+a)=f(-(x-a))=g(x-a)$ where $g(x)=f(-x)$. So, one has to shift $g$ to the right and $g$ is the reflection of $f$ over $y$. The correct order: (1) reflecting $f$ (2) then shifting the reflection to the right.
– zoli
Oct 31 '15 at 23:53














Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
– RiddleMeThis
Nov 1 '15 at 4:45




Ok, so reflect f across y, then shift the reflection to the right. So this means that f(x) = sqrt(x-a)?
– RiddleMeThis
Nov 1 '15 at 4:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I would like to illustrate my comments in the following figure. I hope that this will explain everything.



enter image description here




  • the dark blue line is the graph of $color{blue}{sqrt{(x)}}$ -- note that $sqrt{(x)}$ is not defined on $(-infty,0)$.

  • the purple line is the graph of $color{purple}{g(x)=sqrt{(-x)}}$ -- note that this function is not defined on $(0,infty)$.

  • The green line is the graph of $color{green}{g(x-1)=sqrt{-(x-1)}=sqrt{-x+1}}$ -- note that this function is not defined if $-(x-1)<0$ or if $x>1$, that is over the interval $(1,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 16:39










  • @RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
    – zoli
    Nov 1 '15 at 21:14













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1507124%2fgraph-of-the-function-in-the-form-sqrt-xa-through-manipulation-of-the-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













I would like to illustrate my comments in the following figure. I hope that this will explain everything.



enter image description here




  • the dark blue line is the graph of $color{blue}{sqrt{(x)}}$ -- note that $sqrt{(x)}$ is not defined on $(-infty,0)$.

  • the purple line is the graph of $color{purple}{g(x)=sqrt{(-x)}}$ -- note that this function is not defined on $(0,infty)$.

  • The green line is the graph of $color{green}{g(x-1)=sqrt{-(x-1)}=sqrt{-x+1}}$ -- note that this function is not defined if $-(x-1)<0$ or if $x>1$, that is over the interval $(1,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 16:39










  • @RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
    – zoli
    Nov 1 '15 at 21:14

















up vote
1
down vote













I would like to illustrate my comments in the following figure. I hope that this will explain everything.



enter image description here




  • the dark blue line is the graph of $color{blue}{sqrt{(x)}}$ -- note that $sqrt{(x)}$ is not defined on $(-infty,0)$.

  • the purple line is the graph of $color{purple}{g(x)=sqrt{(-x)}}$ -- note that this function is not defined on $(0,infty)$.

  • The green line is the graph of $color{green}{g(x-1)=sqrt{-(x-1)}=sqrt{-x+1}}$ -- note that this function is not defined if $-(x-1)<0$ or if $x>1$, that is over the interval $(1,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 16:39










  • @RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
    – zoli
    Nov 1 '15 at 21:14















up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I would like to illustrate my comments in the following figure. I hope that this will explain everything.



enter image description here




  • the dark blue line is the graph of $color{blue}{sqrt{(x)}}$ -- note that $sqrt{(x)}$ is not defined on $(-infty,0)$.

  • the purple line is the graph of $color{purple}{g(x)=sqrt{(-x)}}$ -- note that this function is not defined on $(0,infty)$.

  • The green line is the graph of $color{green}{g(x-1)=sqrt{-(x-1)}=sqrt{-x+1}}$ -- note that this function is not defined if $-(x-1)<0$ or if $x>1$, that is over the interval $(1,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer














I would like to illustrate my comments in the following figure. I hope that this will explain everything.



enter image description here




  • the dark blue line is the graph of $color{blue}{sqrt{(x)}}$ -- note that $sqrt{(x)}$ is not defined on $(-infty,0)$.

  • the purple line is the graph of $color{purple}{g(x)=sqrt{(-x)}}$ -- note that this function is not defined on $(0,infty)$.

  • The green line is the graph of $color{green}{g(x-1)=sqrt{-(x-1)}=sqrt{-x+1}}$ -- note that this function is not defined if $-(x-1)<0$ or if $x>1$, that is over the interval $(1,infty)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 1 '15 at 10:56

























answered Nov 1 '15 at 8:11









zoli

16.4k41643




16.4k41643












  • ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 16:39










  • @RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
    – zoli
    Nov 1 '15 at 21:14




















  • ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
    – RiddleMeThis
    Nov 1 '15 at 16:39










  • @RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
    – zoli
    Nov 1 '15 at 21:14


















ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
– RiddleMeThis
Nov 1 '15 at 16:39




ok. The graphs of sqrt(x) and sqrt(-x) make sense to me because they are each reflections of each other across the y-axis. I also understand how the graph of sqrt(x+1) would look like sqrt(x) shifted 1 unit to the left on x-axis. Then you negate every x in that function, by doing f(-x) and this becomes a reflection across y-axis to yield what you drew with the green line. The thing I was doing wrong was that you can't replace x with -x+1. You can only replace x in sqrt(x+1) with -x. So sqrt(-x+1) is a reflection of sqrt(x+1). Is this correct?
– RiddleMeThis
Nov 1 '15 at 16:39












@RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
– zoli
Nov 1 '15 at 21:14






@RiddleMeThis: The rule (my rule) is that if you have a function then you have only three legal transformations $f(x+a)$, $f(x-a)$, and $f(-x)$. So, $f(-xpm a)$ is not legal. You can make it legal via the following operation $f(-xpm a)=f(-(xmp a))$ but then you've created another function: $g(x)=f(-x)$.
– zoli
Nov 1 '15 at 21:14




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1507124%2fgraph-of-the-function-in-the-form-sqrt-xa-through-manipulation-of-the-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?