real Grassmann manifolds, Schubert cells, and boundary maps for computing homology












1












$begingroup$


The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.



Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.



The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.



Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).



This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.



The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.



    Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.



    The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.



    Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).



    This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.



    The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.



      Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.



      The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.



      Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).



      This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.



      The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The problem: Compute $H_ast (G(n,k); mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z})$.



      Define $G(n,k)$ to be the space of $k$-dimensional vector subspaces of $mathbb{R}^n$. Define the Schubert cell $e(m_1,...,m_s)$, so $m_j=m_j(pi)=inf{mmid dim(picap mathbb{R}^m)geq j}$ for $1leq jleq k$, where $pi$ is a $k$-plane in $e(m_1,...,m_s)$. Then the dimension of $e(m_1,...,m_s)$ is $sum_i m_i-i$.



      The boundary of a Schubert cell has the form $partial e(m_1,...,m_s)=sum_i n_i e(m_1,...,m_{i-1},m_i-1,...,m_s)$ where $m_{i-1}<m_i-1$, and $n_i$ is the incidence number.



      Let $D_i$ be the unit $m_i-1$-dimensional disk. Let $d$ be a Schubert cell belonging to the boundary, and since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i})=i$ we have that $d$ is spanned by $s$ unit vectors, $(u_1,...,u_s)$. Only one of the $u_i$ may belong to the boundary of the corresponding $D_i$ -- otherwise, since $dim(picap mathbb{R}^{m_i-1})geq i$ and $dim(picapmathbb{R}^{m_j-1})geq j$, we would have that $m_i(pi)leq m_i-i$ and $m_j(pi)leq m_j-j$, which gives a too-low dimension for this boundary component. Therefore every incidence number is either 2 or 0 (or -2, if you're mindful of orientations).



      This means that if $m$ is odd, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_m)=0$ for $k(n-k)>i>0$, $mathbb{Z}_m$ for $i=0$, and either $mathbb{Z}_m$ or $0$ at $i=k(n-k)$ depending on the parity of $k(n-k)$. If $m=2$, $H_i(G(n,k);mathbb{Z}_2)=mathbb{Z}_2^{N_i(n,k)}$, where $N_i(n,k)$ is the number of Schubert cells of dimension $i$ in $G(n,k)$.



      The general case of $m$ even eludes me, however. This problem was assigned before we covered the universal coefficient theorem, so I would like to solve it without using the theorem. It seems as though this would require a way to count the number of Schubert cells in each boundary with coefficient $pm2$, call it $mu$, and then the homology would be $mathbb{Z}_2^muoplusmathbb{Z}_m^{N_i-mu}$. If I am handed a concrete Schubert cell, I can of course write down its boundary, but have not been able to write down a more precise/general solution, and would appreciate a hint in this direction.







      algebraic-topology schubert-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 28 '18 at 11:01









      Matt Samuel

      39.2k63870




      39.2k63870










      asked Mar 5 '13 at 5:39









      gmossgmoss

      57239




      57239






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.



          Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321137%2freal-grassmann-manifolds-schubert-cells-and-boundary-maps-for-computing-homolo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.



            Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.



              Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.



                Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I haven't explicitly worked out the answer yet (and will not do so soon), but a likely route seems related to Littlewood-Richardson numbers. It is known that the intersection of two cells $e(lambda)e(mu)=sum c^nu_{lambdamu}e(nu)$.



                Moreover, my professor gave me the following hint (well, it's more of an answer than a hint): if one considers the Young tableaux corresponding to a Schubert cell, an element of the boundary of this cell is a Young tableaux with one box removed (one which can be removed). From consideration of the explicit inclusion map of $D^m=e(...)rightarrow G(n,k)$ (I do not want to write it out, but it can be found in J. T Schwartz's book Differential Geometry and Topology), it becomes evident that removing a box on an even-numbered diagonal of the Young tableaux will result in an incidence number of 2, and removing a box on an odd-numbered diagonal will result in an incidence number of 0. Then one can compute the (co)homology with coefficients in whatever $mathbb{Z}_m$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 13 '13 at 5:23









                gmossgmoss

                57239




                57239






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f321137%2freal-grassmann-manifolds-schubert-cells-and-boundary-maps-for-computing-homolo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?