Prime clasfication by some constructive function












3














How to prove or justify the following:



$$ f(g)= frac1{1-g^2} prod_{k=1}^{infty} left(frac{sin(pi frac gk)}{pi frac gk} cdot frac 1{1-frac{g^2}{k^2}}right).
$$

The above statement can illustrate the following facts:



(1) if $f(g) = 0$, then $g$ is composite number

(2) If $f(g)$ is not equal to $0$, the $g$ is prime number

(3) if $f(1+g) = 0$, then $g$ is prime.



Please justify.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • @martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:32






  • 2




    Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
    – Norbert
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:34








  • 1




    I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
    – Harald Hanche-Olsen
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:40










  • f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:54






  • 2




    For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
    – Berci
    Nov 16 '12 at 11:02
















3














How to prove or justify the following:



$$ f(g)= frac1{1-g^2} prod_{k=1}^{infty} left(frac{sin(pi frac gk)}{pi frac gk} cdot frac 1{1-frac{g^2}{k^2}}right).
$$

The above statement can illustrate the following facts:



(1) if $f(g) = 0$, then $g$ is composite number

(2) If $f(g)$ is not equal to $0$, the $g$ is prime number

(3) if $f(1+g) = 0$, then $g$ is prime.



Please justify.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • @martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:32






  • 2




    Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
    – Norbert
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:34








  • 1




    I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
    – Harald Hanche-Olsen
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:40










  • f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:54






  • 2




    For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
    – Berci
    Nov 16 '12 at 11:02














3












3








3


0





How to prove or justify the following:



$$ f(g)= frac1{1-g^2} prod_{k=1}^{infty} left(frac{sin(pi frac gk)}{pi frac gk} cdot frac 1{1-frac{g^2}{k^2}}right).
$$

The above statement can illustrate the following facts:



(1) if $f(g) = 0$, then $g$ is composite number

(2) If $f(g)$ is not equal to $0$, the $g$ is prime number

(3) if $f(1+g) = 0$, then $g$ is prime.



Please justify.










share|cite|improve this question















How to prove or justify the following:



$$ f(g)= frac1{1-g^2} prod_{k=1}^{infty} left(frac{sin(pi frac gk)}{pi frac gk} cdot frac 1{1-frac{g^2}{k^2}}right).
$$

The above statement can illustrate the following facts:



(1) if $f(g) = 0$, then $g$ is composite number

(2) If $f(g)$ is not equal to $0$, the $g$ is prime number

(3) if $f(1+g) = 0$, then $g$ is prime.



Please justify.







number-theory prime-numbers conjectures






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:02









amWhy

192k28224439




192k28224439










asked Nov 16 '12 at 10:26









vmrfdu123456

1427




1427












  • @martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:32






  • 2




    Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
    – Norbert
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:34








  • 1




    I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
    – Harald Hanche-Olsen
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:40










  • f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:54






  • 2




    For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
    – Berci
    Nov 16 '12 at 11:02


















  • @martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:32






  • 2




    Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
    – Norbert
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:34








  • 1




    I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
    – Harald Hanche-Olsen
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:40










  • f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
    – vmrfdu123456
    Nov 16 '12 at 10:54






  • 2




    For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
    – Berci
    Nov 16 '12 at 11:02
















@martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
– vmrfdu123456
Nov 16 '12 at 10:32




@martini! Thank you so much for your editing work.
– vmrfdu123456
Nov 16 '12 at 10:32




2




2




Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
– Norbert
Nov 16 '12 at 10:34






Note that $1/(1-g^2)$ is redundant
– Norbert
Nov 16 '12 at 10:34






1




1




I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Nov 16 '12 at 10:40




I am confused. What is $f$? It is given by the formula, then the formula is true by definition. And if not, how is it defined?
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Nov 16 '12 at 10:40












f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
– vmrfdu123456
Nov 16 '12 at 10:54




f is given by the formula. of course, formula is true by definition.
– vmrfdu123456
Nov 16 '12 at 10:54




2




2




For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
– Berci
Nov 16 '12 at 11:02




For me it seems that in this form, (3) contradicts (1) and (2).
– Berci
Nov 16 '12 at 11:02










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238607%2fprime-clasfication-by-some-constructive-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f238607%2fprime-clasfication-by-some-constructive-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?