What does x mean in (1-x)A – xB composite materials, molar ratio, weight ratio or volume fraction?
$begingroup$
I've been collecting data about ceramic materials and often I get to see composite materials are described as $(1-x)ce{A} - xce{B}$. I am confused what this $x$ means. And I haven't seen any of the papers mention what $x$ is unless %wt is given specifically.
For an example in $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF}$ ceramic material, does $x$ mean molar ratio or weight ratio? For me it doesn't make sense to think of $x$ as a volume fraction as most of the times powders of these materials are taken for sintering.
If nothing is mentioned, is it all right to assume $x$ as the molar ratio?
Can we assume volume fraction is equal to molar ratio even in solids or liquids?
physical-chemistry concentration solid-state-chemistry notation
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been collecting data about ceramic materials and often I get to see composite materials are described as $(1-x)ce{A} - xce{B}$. I am confused what this $x$ means. And I haven't seen any of the papers mention what $x$ is unless %wt is given specifically.
For an example in $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF}$ ceramic material, does $x$ mean molar ratio or weight ratio? For me it doesn't make sense to think of $x$ as a volume fraction as most of the times powders of these materials are taken for sintering.
If nothing is mentioned, is it all right to assume $x$ as the molar ratio?
Can we assume volume fraction is equal to molar ratio even in solids or liquids?
physical-chemistry concentration solid-state-chemistry notation
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've been collecting data about ceramic materials and often I get to see composite materials are described as $(1-x)ce{A} - xce{B}$. I am confused what this $x$ means. And I haven't seen any of the papers mention what $x$ is unless %wt is given specifically.
For an example in $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF}$ ceramic material, does $x$ mean molar ratio or weight ratio? For me it doesn't make sense to think of $x$ as a volume fraction as most of the times powders of these materials are taken for sintering.
If nothing is mentioned, is it all right to assume $x$ as the molar ratio?
Can we assume volume fraction is equal to molar ratio even in solids or liquids?
physical-chemistry concentration solid-state-chemistry notation
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
$endgroup$
I've been collecting data about ceramic materials and often I get to see composite materials are described as $(1-x)ce{A} - xce{B}$. I am confused what this $x$ means. And I haven't seen any of the papers mention what $x$ is unless %wt is given specifically.
For an example in $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF}$ ceramic material, does $x$ mean molar ratio or weight ratio? For me it doesn't make sense to think of $x$ as a volume fraction as most of the times powders of these materials are taken for sintering.
If nothing is mentioned, is it all right to assume $x$ as the molar ratio?
Can we assume volume fraction is equal to molar ratio even in solids or liquids?
physical-chemistry concentration solid-state-chemistry notation
physical-chemistry concentration solid-state-chemistry notation
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
edited Feb 12 at 16:59
andselisk
16.4k653115
16.4k653115
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
asked Feb 12 at 16:45
avinavin
182
182
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here, $x$ is a variable $(xin[0;1])$ denoting mole fraction of a given constituent in a phase of variable composition (non-stoichiometric compound).
This is an algebraic way of denoting a given compound from the phase diagram for a solid solution: $x$ corresponds to its abscissa axis.
And no, volume fraction is not equal to mole fraction and is overall a very inconvenient variable to use, so it's usually being avoided.
For example, volume fraction would deviate for the different morphologies and allotropes of the same solid, which is not useful for the description of chemical composition, not to mention it's also temperature-dependent.
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109422%2fwhat-does-x-mean-in-1-xa-xb-composite-materials-molar-ratio-weight-ratio-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here, $x$ is a variable $(xin[0;1])$ denoting mole fraction of a given constituent in a phase of variable composition (non-stoichiometric compound).
This is an algebraic way of denoting a given compound from the phase diagram for a solid solution: $x$ corresponds to its abscissa axis.
And no, volume fraction is not equal to mole fraction and is overall a very inconvenient variable to use, so it's usually being avoided.
For example, volume fraction would deviate for the different morphologies and allotropes of the same solid, which is not useful for the description of chemical composition, not to mention it's also temperature-dependent.
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here, $x$ is a variable $(xin[0;1])$ denoting mole fraction of a given constituent in a phase of variable composition (non-stoichiometric compound).
This is an algebraic way of denoting a given compound from the phase diagram for a solid solution: $x$ corresponds to its abscissa axis.
And no, volume fraction is not equal to mole fraction and is overall a very inconvenient variable to use, so it's usually being avoided.
For example, volume fraction would deviate for the different morphologies and allotropes of the same solid, which is not useful for the description of chemical composition, not to mention it's also temperature-dependent.
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here, $x$ is a variable $(xin[0;1])$ denoting mole fraction of a given constituent in a phase of variable composition (non-stoichiometric compound).
This is an algebraic way of denoting a given compound from the phase diagram for a solid solution: $x$ corresponds to its abscissa axis.
And no, volume fraction is not equal to mole fraction and is overall a very inconvenient variable to use, so it's usually being avoided.
For example, volume fraction would deviate for the different morphologies and allotropes of the same solid, which is not useful for the description of chemical composition, not to mention it's also temperature-dependent.
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
$endgroup$
Here, $x$ is a variable $(xin[0;1])$ denoting mole fraction of a given constituent in a phase of variable composition (non-stoichiometric compound).
This is an algebraic way of denoting a given compound from the phase diagram for a solid solution: $x$ corresponds to its abscissa axis.
And no, volume fraction is not equal to mole fraction and is overall a very inconvenient variable to use, so it's usually being avoided.
For example, volume fraction would deviate for the different morphologies and allotropes of the same solid, which is not useful for the description of chemical composition, not to mention it's also temperature-dependent.
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
edited Feb 12 at 17:26
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
answered Feb 12 at 16:56
andseliskandselisk
16.4k653115
16.4k653115
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
1
1
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
Since the OP refers to sintering I don't think that mole fraction can be assumed. In fact the OP mentions that some articles explicitly specify wt %.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
Feb 12 at 17:19
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW Mole fraction is pretty much a default in the absence of additional remarks. Of course, if there is %wt notation, then it's mass fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 17:24
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
$begingroup$
@MaxW I believe almost all the ceramic compounds are made by sintering. Do you believe 0.8MgO - 0.2LiF could mean weight fractions? Most of the related papers don't mention what x is, although when they do mention about 'weights', they make sure to present it as a percentage, like MgO - 20% LiF. But I'm sure there should be some convention among scientists to understand what x really is unless explicitly specified?
$endgroup$
– avin
Feb 12 at 18:10
2
2
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
$begingroup$
@avin Again, unless there are any specific notes, $(1-x)ce{MgO} - xce{LiF} ≡ ce{Li_xMg_{(1-x)}O_{(1-x)}F_x}$, so by default $x$ implicates mole fraction.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Feb 12 at 18:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f109422%2fwhat-does-x-mean-in-1-xa-xb-composite-materials-molar-ratio-weight-ratio-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
