Reducing time complexity in comparing contiguous subarrays?












3















So say I have a list sequences such as this.



I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



lst = [ 
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]


E.g.



Input: 4 3
Output: 2 1 2


So what I have right now is



lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?










share|improve this question



























    3















    So say I have a list sequences such as this.



    I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



    For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



    lst = [ 
    (1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
    (1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
    (1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
    (2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
    (2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
    (2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
    (3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
    (3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
    (3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
    ]


    E.g.



    Input: 4 3
    Output: 2 1 2


    So what I have right now is



    lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


    Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      So say I have a list sequences such as this.



      I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



      For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



      lst = [ 
      (1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
      (1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
      (1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
      (2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
      (2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
      (2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
      (3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
      (3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
      (3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
      ]


      E.g.



      Input: 4 3
      Output: 2 1 2


      So what I have right now is



      lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


      Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?










      share|improve this question














      So say I have a list sequences such as this.



      I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.



      For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.



      lst = [ 
      (1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
      (1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
      (1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
      (2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
      (2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
      (2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
      (3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
      (3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
      (3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
      ]


      E.g.



      Input: 4 3
      Output: 2 1 2


      So what I have right now is



      lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]


      Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?







      python-3.x






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 23:59









      ThegreatfooThegreatfoo

      385




      385
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          If you can use numpy, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:



          arr = np.array(lst)
          arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
          (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
          # or:
          arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
          (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]


          Returning:



          array([[1, 1, 1],
          [1, 2, 3],
          [2, 1, 2],
          [2, 3, 2],
          [2, 3, 3],
          [3, 2, 1],
          [3, 2, 3],
          [3, 3, 2],
          [3, 3, 3]])





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384351%2freducing-time-complexity-in-comparing-contiguous-subarrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            If you can use numpy, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:



            arr = np.array(lst)
            arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
            (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
            # or:
            arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
            (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]


            Returning:



            array([[1, 1, 1],
            [1, 2, 3],
            [2, 1, 2],
            [2, 3, 2],
            [2, 3, 3],
            [3, 2, 1],
            [3, 2, 3],
            [3, 3, 2],
            [3, 3, 3]])





            share|improve this answer




























              0














              If you can use numpy, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:



              arr = np.array(lst)
              arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
              (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
              # or:
              arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
              (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]


              Returning:



              array([[1, 1, 1],
              [1, 2, 3],
              [2, 1, 2],
              [2, 3, 2],
              [2, 3, 3],
              [3, 2, 1],
              [3, 2, 3],
              [3, 3, 2],
              [3, 3, 3]])





              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                If you can use numpy, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:



                arr = np.array(lst)
                arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
                (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
                # or:
                arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
                (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]


                Returning:



                array([[1, 1, 1],
                [1, 2, 3],
                [2, 1, 2],
                [2, 3, 2],
                [2, 3, 3],
                [3, 2, 1],
                [3, 2, 3],
                [3, 3, 2],
                [3, 3, 3]])





                share|improve this answer













                If you can use numpy, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:



                arr = np.array(lst)
                arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
                (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
                # or:
                arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
                (arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]


                Returning:



                array([[1, 1, 1],
                [1, 2, 3],
                [2, 1, 2],
                [2, 3, 2],
                [2, 3, 3],
                [3, 2, 1],
                [3, 2, 3],
                [3, 3, 2],
                [3, 3, 3]])






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 20 '18 at 0:08









                sacuLsacuL

                30.1k41940




                30.1k41940






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384351%2freducing-time-complexity-in-comparing-contiguous-subarrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?