How to know if a vector is in a subspace spanned by a set of vectors?












0












$begingroup$


I have $v_1=(1,0,-1),; v_2=(2,1,3),; v_3=(4,2,6); text{ and}; w=(3,1,2),$
where $v_1,v_2,v_3;$ and $w$ are all column vectors.

I want to know if $w$ is in the subspace spanned by $(v_1,v_2,v_3).$



I write down:



$$begin{aligned}x_1+2x_2+4x_3&=3\x_2+2x_3&=1\-x_1+3x_2+6x_3&=2end{aligned}$$



And I augment it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
-1 & 3 & 6& 2 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



Now, from what the professor told us, I should row reduce it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
0 & 0 & 0& 0 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



And this is my first question : why should I row reduce it only to the last row being all $0$'s?



Moreover, On the book it states :




Since the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix
coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix
of the coefficients, the system admits a non-trivial solution, and $win
Span {v_1, v_2, v_3}.$




Since I have a form of dyscalculia this statement appears unclear to me. Could somebody please explain in simple words what this means?



What do they mean when they say the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients? Why does this imply that the systems admits a non trivial solution ? What is the non trivial solution here?



If you could help me please please please explain it in the simplest way possible....Thanks for the help guys! You are great.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:27










  • $begingroup$
    Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:33










  • $begingroup$
    The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 23:02
















0












$begingroup$


I have $v_1=(1,0,-1),; v_2=(2,1,3),; v_3=(4,2,6); text{ and}; w=(3,1,2),$
where $v_1,v_2,v_3;$ and $w$ are all column vectors.

I want to know if $w$ is in the subspace spanned by $(v_1,v_2,v_3).$



I write down:



$$begin{aligned}x_1+2x_2+4x_3&=3\x_2+2x_3&=1\-x_1+3x_2+6x_3&=2end{aligned}$$



And I augment it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
-1 & 3 & 6& 2 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



Now, from what the professor told us, I should row reduce it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
0 & 0 & 0& 0 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



And this is my first question : why should I row reduce it only to the last row being all $0$'s?



Moreover, On the book it states :




Since the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix
coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix
of the coefficients, the system admits a non-trivial solution, and $win
Span {v_1, v_2, v_3}.$




Since I have a form of dyscalculia this statement appears unclear to me. Could somebody please explain in simple words what this means?



What do they mean when they say the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients? Why does this imply that the systems admits a non trivial solution ? What is the non trivial solution here?



If you could help me please please please explain it in the simplest way possible....Thanks for the help guys! You are great.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:27










  • $begingroup$
    Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:33










  • $begingroup$
    The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 23:02














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have $v_1=(1,0,-1),; v_2=(2,1,3),; v_3=(4,2,6); text{ and}; w=(3,1,2),$
where $v_1,v_2,v_3;$ and $w$ are all column vectors.

I want to know if $w$ is in the subspace spanned by $(v_1,v_2,v_3).$



I write down:



$$begin{aligned}x_1+2x_2+4x_3&=3\x_2+2x_3&=1\-x_1+3x_2+6x_3&=2end{aligned}$$



And I augment it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
-1 & 3 & 6& 2 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



Now, from what the professor told us, I should row reduce it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
0 & 0 & 0& 0 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



And this is my first question : why should I row reduce it only to the last row being all $0$'s?



Moreover, On the book it states :




Since the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix
coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix
of the coefficients, the system admits a non-trivial solution, and $win
Span {v_1, v_2, v_3}.$




Since I have a form of dyscalculia this statement appears unclear to me. Could somebody please explain in simple words what this means?



What do they mean when they say the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients? Why does this imply that the systems admits a non trivial solution ? What is the non trivial solution here?



If you could help me please please please explain it in the simplest way possible....Thanks for the help guys! You are great.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have $v_1=(1,0,-1),; v_2=(2,1,3),; v_3=(4,2,6); text{ and}; w=(3,1,2),$
where $v_1,v_2,v_3;$ and $w$ are all column vectors.

I want to know if $w$ is in the subspace spanned by $(v_1,v_2,v_3).$



I write down:



$$begin{aligned}x_1+2x_2+4x_3&=3\x_2+2x_3&=1\-x_1+3x_2+6x_3&=2end{aligned}$$



And I augment it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
-1 & 3 & 6& 2 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



Now, from what the professor told us, I should row reduce it to get



$$
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 2 & 4 &3 \
0 & 1 & 2&1 \
0 & 0 & 0& 0 \
end{pmatrix}
$$



And this is my first question : why should I row reduce it only to the last row being all $0$'s?



Moreover, On the book it states :




Since the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix
coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix
of the coefficients, the system admits a non-trivial solution, and $win
Span {v_1, v_2, v_3}.$




Since I have a form of dyscalculia this statement appears unclear to me. Could somebody please explain in simple words what this means?



What do they mean when they say the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients? Why does this imply that the systems admits a non trivial solution ? What is the non trivial solution here?



If you could help me please please please explain it in the simplest way possible....Thanks for the help guys! You are great.







linear-algebra matrices matrix-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 10 '18 at 20:43









user376343

3,7883828




3,7883828










asked Dec 2 '18 at 21:23









BM97BM97

758




758












  • $begingroup$
    Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:27










  • $begingroup$
    Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:33










  • $begingroup$
    The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 23:02


















  • $begingroup$
    Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:27










  • $begingroup$
    Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
    $endgroup$
    – BM97
    Dec 2 '18 at 21:33










  • $begingroup$
    The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Dec 2 '18 at 23:02
















$begingroup$
Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 2 '18 at 21:27




$begingroup$
Build your matrix by rows, i.e.: take the transpose of your matrix, and now reduce it by rows. Then $;wintext{Span},{v_1,v_2,v_3};$ iff the last row becomes all zeros. In this particular case, since $;v_1,v_2,v_3;$ are not linearly independent, they do not form a basis of $;Bbb R^3;$ and it is thus not guaranteed $;w;$ is a linear combination of them...
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 2 '18 at 21:27












$begingroup$
Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
$endgroup$
– BM97
Dec 2 '18 at 21:31




$begingroup$
Is it necessary to take the transpose? Can't i just row reduce it ? How do i know when i should stop row reducing?
$endgroup$
– BM97
Dec 2 '18 at 21:31












$begingroup$
What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
$endgroup$
– BM97
Dec 2 '18 at 21:33




$begingroup$
What does it mean that the dimension of the space of the columns of the augmented matrix coincides with the dimension of the space of the columns of the matrix of the coefficients?
$endgroup$
– BM97
Dec 2 '18 at 21:33












$begingroup$
The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 2 '18 at 23:02




$begingroup$
The reduction ends when your matrix reaches an echelon form, i.e.: when it is "as diagonal" as possible. This you achieved when the last row became all zeros (this is not always the case, though). Observe that it is clear that once the first column plus once the second column eplux zero the third one equals the fourth column. But imo it is easier to do this with the vectors as rows, and not columns, and reducing by rows: if you this you'll get the last two rows become all zero, which mean those two vectors represented by those rows are lin. comb of the first two.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Dec 2 '18 at 23:02










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023214%2fhow-to-know-if-a-vector-is-in-a-subspace-spanned-by-a-set-of-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023214%2fhow-to-know-if-a-vector-is-in-a-subspace-spanned-by-a-set-of-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?