Confusion about exact DEs











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If I understand the definition of an exact de correctly, if $M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy=0 $ and $M_y=N_x$, then
$$f(x,y)=int M(x,y)dx + g(y)$$
and
$$g'(y)=int M(x,y)dx-N(x,y)$$



1) Is my interpretation correct?



2) Is M always the expression in the given equation preceding dx? Is N always the expression preceding Dy?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If I understand the definition of an exact de correctly, if $M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy=0 $ and $M_y=N_x$, then
    $$f(x,y)=int M(x,y)dx + g(y)$$
    and
    $$g'(y)=int M(x,y)dx-N(x,y)$$



    1) Is my interpretation correct?



    2) Is M always the expression in the given equation preceding dx? Is N always the expression preceding Dy?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If I understand the definition of an exact de correctly, if $M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy=0 $ and $M_y=N_x$, then
      $$f(x,y)=int M(x,y)dx + g(y)$$
      and
      $$g'(y)=int M(x,y)dx-N(x,y)$$



      1) Is my interpretation correct?



      2) Is M always the expression in the given equation preceding dx? Is N always the expression preceding Dy?










      share|cite|improve this question















      If I understand the definition of an exact de correctly, if $M(x,y)dx+N(x,y)dy=0 $ and $M_y=N_x$, then
      $$f(x,y)=int M(x,y)dx + g(y)$$
      and
      $$g'(y)=int M(x,y)dx-N(x,y)$$



      1) Is my interpretation correct?



      2) Is M always the expression in the given equation preceding dx? Is N always the expression preceding Dy?







      calculus differential-equations multivariable-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 12:31

























      asked Nov 19 at 18:12









      Joe Stavitsky

      2461317




      2461317






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          1.
          Your interpretation is partially correct.
          $$
          F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
          $$

          However:
          $$
          g'(y) := N(x,y) - frac{partial}{partial y} int M(x,y)dx
          $$

          This is because $frac{partial F}{partial y} = N$.
          $$
          F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
          implies
          N(x, y) = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + frac{partial}{partial y}g(y) \ = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + g'(y)
          $$




          1. Yes, $M(x, y)$ precedes $dx$ and $N(x, y)$ precedes $dy$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005290%2fconfusion-about-exact-des%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            1.
            Your interpretation is partially correct.
            $$
            F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
            $$

            However:
            $$
            g'(y) := N(x,y) - frac{partial}{partial y} int M(x,y)dx
            $$

            This is because $frac{partial F}{partial y} = N$.
            $$
            F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
            implies
            N(x, y) = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + frac{partial}{partial y}g(y) \ = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + g'(y)
            $$




            1. Yes, $M(x, y)$ precedes $dx$ and $N(x, y)$ precedes $dy$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              1.
              Your interpretation is partially correct.
              $$
              F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
              $$

              However:
              $$
              g'(y) := N(x,y) - frac{partial}{partial y} int M(x,y)dx
              $$

              This is because $frac{partial F}{partial y} = N$.
              $$
              F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
              implies
              N(x, y) = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + frac{partial}{partial y}g(y) \ = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + g'(y)
              $$




              1. Yes, $M(x, y)$ precedes $dx$ and $N(x, y)$ precedes $dy$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                1.
                Your interpretation is partially correct.
                $$
                F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
                $$

                However:
                $$
                g'(y) := N(x,y) - frac{partial}{partial y} int M(x,y)dx
                $$

                This is because $frac{partial F}{partial y} = N$.
                $$
                F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
                implies
                N(x, y) = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + frac{partial}{partial y}g(y) \ = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + g'(y)
                $$




                1. Yes, $M(x, y)$ precedes $dx$ and $N(x, y)$ precedes $dy$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                1.
                Your interpretation is partially correct.
                $$
                F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
                $$

                However:
                $$
                g'(y) := N(x,y) - frac{partial}{partial y} int M(x,y)dx
                $$

                This is because $frac{partial F}{partial y} = N$.
                $$
                F(x, y) := int M(x,y)dx + g(y)
                implies
                N(x, y) = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + frac{partial}{partial y}g(y) \ = frac{partial}{partial y}int M(x,y)dx + g'(y)
                $$




                1. Yes, $M(x, y)$ precedes $dx$ and $N(x, y)$ precedes $dy$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 19 at 23:51









                chaseklvk

                515




                515






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005290%2fconfusion-about-exact-des%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?