All the citations in the references are being numbered as '0' in ArXiv while uploading from Overleaf











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I compiled the latex source code from overleafv2 using the submit for arXiv tab and I am using this downloaded zip file for my submission. The pdf preview of the submission shows all of the references with the same count of '0'. I am using biblatex package for references. Not sure where the problem exists so any suggestions are welcomed.



EDIT 1:



Output of ArXiv:
The submission processed ok. Please find the link for the arXiv output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12uoDIo0JePOjZ_5Ul3huuRwt8QZ3Ix7FPhkJCFERdY0/edit?usp=sharing



Output of Overleaf:
There are a lot of Overfull and Underfull warnings and a couple of others. From what I see, it doesn't have any issues related to the bibliography. Please find the link for the overleaf output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yKgqkmkQmdeb_S8CFJLrAAKvxIerFPJZLdJ_PD3YqI0/edit?usp=sharing










share|improve this question
























  • Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
    – zyy
    Dec 6 at 19:19










  • Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
    – moewe
    Dec 6 at 20:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:34










  • @moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:55










  • Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
    – moewe
    Dec 8 at 12:38















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I compiled the latex source code from overleafv2 using the submit for arXiv tab and I am using this downloaded zip file for my submission. The pdf preview of the submission shows all of the references with the same count of '0'. I am using biblatex package for references. Not sure where the problem exists so any suggestions are welcomed.



EDIT 1:



Output of ArXiv:
The submission processed ok. Please find the link for the arXiv output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12uoDIo0JePOjZ_5Ul3huuRwt8QZ3Ix7FPhkJCFERdY0/edit?usp=sharing



Output of Overleaf:
There are a lot of Overfull and Underfull warnings and a couple of others. From what I see, it doesn't have any issues related to the bibliography. Please find the link for the overleaf output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yKgqkmkQmdeb_S8CFJLrAAKvxIerFPJZLdJ_PD3YqI0/edit?usp=sharing










share|improve this question
























  • Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
    – zyy
    Dec 6 at 19:19










  • Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
    – moewe
    Dec 6 at 20:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:34










  • @moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:55










  • Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
    – moewe
    Dec 8 at 12:38













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I compiled the latex source code from overleafv2 using the submit for arXiv tab and I am using this downloaded zip file for my submission. The pdf preview of the submission shows all of the references with the same count of '0'. I am using biblatex package for references. Not sure where the problem exists so any suggestions are welcomed.



EDIT 1:



Output of ArXiv:
The submission processed ok. Please find the link for the arXiv output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12uoDIo0JePOjZ_5Ul3huuRwt8QZ3Ix7FPhkJCFERdY0/edit?usp=sharing



Output of Overleaf:
There are a lot of Overfull and Underfull warnings and a couple of others. From what I see, it doesn't have any issues related to the bibliography. Please find the link for the overleaf output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yKgqkmkQmdeb_S8CFJLrAAKvxIerFPJZLdJ_PD3YqI0/edit?usp=sharing










share|improve this question















I compiled the latex source code from overleafv2 using the submit for arXiv tab and I am using this downloaded zip file for my submission. The pdf preview of the submission shows all of the references with the same count of '0'. I am using biblatex package for references. Not sure where the problem exists so any suggestions are welcomed.



EDIT 1:



Output of ArXiv:
The submission processed ok. Please find the link for the arXiv output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12uoDIo0JePOjZ_5Ul3huuRwt8QZ3Ix7FPhkJCFERdY0/edit?usp=sharing



Output of Overleaf:
There are a lot of Overfull and Underfull warnings and a couple of others. From what I see, it doesn't have any issues related to the bibliography. Please find the link for the overleaf output.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yKgqkmkQmdeb_S8CFJLrAAKvxIerFPJZLdJ_PD3YqI0/edit?usp=sharing







biblatex overleaf arxiv






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 7:50

























asked Dec 6 at 17:46









saha rudra

1084




1084












  • Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
    – zyy
    Dec 6 at 19:19










  • Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
    – moewe
    Dec 6 at 20:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:34










  • @moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:55










  • Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
    – moewe
    Dec 8 at 12:38


















  • Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
    – zyy
    Dec 6 at 19:19










  • Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
    – moewe
    Dec 6 at 20:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:34










  • @moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
    – saha rudra
    Dec 8 at 7:55










  • Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
    – moewe
    Dec 8 at 12:38
















Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
– zyy
Dec 6 at 19:19




Could you show us your code and its output so that we could work on that?
– zyy
Dec 6 at 19:19












Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:35




Related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/429436/35864. We will need to know a little more about your situation: Do you get any errors or warnings on your compilation on Overleaf? Does the arXiv report any errors or warnings? Can you show us a minimal example of what you are doing?
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:35












@moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
– saha rudra
Dec 8 at 7:34




@moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I generated a .bbl file from overleaf and uploaded that zip file on arXiv.
– saha rudra
Dec 8 at 7:34












@moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
– saha rudra
Dec 8 at 7:55




@moewe I have added the compilations outputs from arXiv and overleaf.
– saha rudra
Dec 8 at 7:55












Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
– moewe
Dec 8 at 12:38




Unfortunately, the arXiv log is not as verbose as I hoped. All I can see is that a .bbl file called egpaper_final.bbl is read. TeX reports no error when that file is read, so it stands to reason that the .bbl format is OK. It is a bit odd that biblatex then complains about missing references (e.g. clevr1) and only stops complaining on the second run. In a test document on my machine, LaTeX would not complain on the first run and everything would be fine by the second run. Do you by chance use the option defernumbers?
– moewe
Dec 8 at 12:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










As confirmed in the comments your project uses defernumbers. With that option the label number for an entry is not assigned at the beginning of the document when the entry data is read from the .bbl file, instead the label number is assigned only once the entry is printed in the bibliography. Consider the following example with and without defernumbers



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, defernumbers, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{sigfridsson,moraux,worman,nussbaum,geer,cicero}
printbibliography[keyword=secondary]
printbibliography[notkeyword=secondary]
end{document}


For defernumbers to work properly the compilation cycle must include




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all cite keys are bold)

  2. Biber

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  4. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


If an appropriate .bbl is already present (i.e. if you compile the example from above as just described and then delete all files except the .tex and .bbl file) the compilation cycle still (perhaps unexpectedly) needs to include three LaTeX runs




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  2. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


That is because biblatex's heuristic to determine whether a Biber run is required will request a Biber run in the first LaTeX compilation. If a Biber run is requested, a few auxiliary bits are not written out to the .aux file in the anticipation that a subsequent requested Biber run could potentially change the relevant information anyway. This means that relevant data is only written to the .aux file on the second LaTeX run, when biblatex has given up asking for a new Biber run.



The log files of your arXiv submission show that the arXiv only runs LaTeX twice, hence you get only 0s instead of the proper citation labels.



The relevant information for defernumbers lives in the .aux file. It might be possible to upload the .aux file to the arXiv as well (I'm not sure if they accept that or will automatically reject .aux uploads; uploaded .aux files might cause version or other package incompatibilities) in which case you would obtain the desired result after only one LaTeX run. This solution is more of a last resort.



A different and better solution would be to tell LaTeX not to ask for a Biber run at all when you upload a file to the arXiv. Just add



makeatletter
letblx@rerun@biberrelax
makeatother


to your preamble. Since the arXiv won't run Biber for you anyway, there is no point in having biblatex request a Biber run. In this instance we bypass a few tests that would block information subject to change after a Biber run from being written to the .aux file. In the end then two LaTeX runs should be enough for your citations to show up properly.






share|improve this answer





















  • I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
    – saha rudra
    2 days ago










  • @saharudra Glad it worked!
    – moewe
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463556%2fall-the-citations-in-the-references-are-being-numbered-as-0-in-arxiv-while-upl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










As confirmed in the comments your project uses defernumbers. With that option the label number for an entry is not assigned at the beginning of the document when the entry data is read from the .bbl file, instead the label number is assigned only once the entry is printed in the bibliography. Consider the following example with and without defernumbers



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, defernumbers, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{sigfridsson,moraux,worman,nussbaum,geer,cicero}
printbibliography[keyword=secondary]
printbibliography[notkeyword=secondary]
end{document}


For defernumbers to work properly the compilation cycle must include




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all cite keys are bold)

  2. Biber

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  4. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


If an appropriate .bbl is already present (i.e. if you compile the example from above as just described and then delete all files except the .tex and .bbl file) the compilation cycle still (perhaps unexpectedly) needs to include three LaTeX runs




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  2. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


That is because biblatex's heuristic to determine whether a Biber run is required will request a Biber run in the first LaTeX compilation. If a Biber run is requested, a few auxiliary bits are not written out to the .aux file in the anticipation that a subsequent requested Biber run could potentially change the relevant information anyway. This means that relevant data is only written to the .aux file on the second LaTeX run, when biblatex has given up asking for a new Biber run.



The log files of your arXiv submission show that the arXiv only runs LaTeX twice, hence you get only 0s instead of the proper citation labels.



The relevant information for defernumbers lives in the .aux file. It might be possible to upload the .aux file to the arXiv as well (I'm not sure if they accept that or will automatically reject .aux uploads; uploaded .aux files might cause version or other package incompatibilities) in which case you would obtain the desired result after only one LaTeX run. This solution is more of a last resort.



A different and better solution would be to tell LaTeX not to ask for a Biber run at all when you upload a file to the arXiv. Just add



makeatletter
letblx@rerun@biberrelax
makeatother


to your preamble. Since the arXiv won't run Biber for you anyway, there is no point in having biblatex request a Biber run. In this instance we bypass a few tests that would block information subject to change after a Biber run from being written to the .aux file. In the end then two LaTeX runs should be enough for your citations to show up properly.






share|improve this answer





















  • I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
    – saha rudra
    2 days ago










  • @saharudra Glad it worked!
    – moewe
    2 days ago















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










As confirmed in the comments your project uses defernumbers. With that option the label number for an entry is not assigned at the beginning of the document when the entry data is read from the .bbl file, instead the label number is assigned only once the entry is printed in the bibliography. Consider the following example with and without defernumbers



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, defernumbers, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{sigfridsson,moraux,worman,nussbaum,geer,cicero}
printbibliography[keyword=secondary]
printbibliography[notkeyword=secondary]
end{document}


For defernumbers to work properly the compilation cycle must include




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all cite keys are bold)

  2. Biber

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  4. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


If an appropriate .bbl is already present (i.e. if you compile the example from above as just described and then delete all files except the .tex and .bbl file) the compilation cycle still (perhaps unexpectedly) needs to include three LaTeX runs




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  2. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


That is because biblatex's heuristic to determine whether a Biber run is required will request a Biber run in the first LaTeX compilation. If a Biber run is requested, a few auxiliary bits are not written out to the .aux file in the anticipation that a subsequent requested Biber run could potentially change the relevant information anyway. This means that relevant data is only written to the .aux file on the second LaTeX run, when biblatex has given up asking for a new Biber run.



The log files of your arXiv submission show that the arXiv only runs LaTeX twice, hence you get only 0s instead of the proper citation labels.



The relevant information for defernumbers lives in the .aux file. It might be possible to upload the .aux file to the arXiv as well (I'm not sure if they accept that or will automatically reject .aux uploads; uploaded .aux files might cause version or other package incompatibilities) in which case you would obtain the desired result after only one LaTeX run. This solution is more of a last resort.



A different and better solution would be to tell LaTeX not to ask for a Biber run at all when you upload a file to the arXiv. Just add



makeatletter
letblx@rerun@biberrelax
makeatother


to your preamble. Since the arXiv won't run Biber for you anyway, there is no point in having biblatex request a Biber run. In this instance we bypass a few tests that would block information subject to change after a Biber run from being written to the .aux file. In the end then two LaTeX runs should be enough for your citations to show up properly.






share|improve this answer





















  • I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
    – saha rudra
    2 days ago










  • @saharudra Glad it worked!
    – moewe
    2 days ago













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






As confirmed in the comments your project uses defernumbers. With that option the label number for an entry is not assigned at the beginning of the document when the entry data is read from the .bbl file, instead the label number is assigned only once the entry is printed in the bibliography. Consider the following example with and without defernumbers



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, defernumbers, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{sigfridsson,moraux,worman,nussbaum,geer,cicero}
printbibliography[keyword=secondary]
printbibliography[notkeyword=secondary]
end{document}


For defernumbers to work properly the compilation cycle must include




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all cite keys are bold)

  2. Biber

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  4. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


If an appropriate .bbl is already present (i.e. if you compile the example from above as just described and then delete all files except the .tex and .bbl file) the compilation cycle still (perhaps unexpectedly) needs to include three LaTeX runs




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  2. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


That is because biblatex's heuristic to determine whether a Biber run is required will request a Biber run in the first LaTeX compilation. If a Biber run is requested, a few auxiliary bits are not written out to the .aux file in the anticipation that a subsequent requested Biber run could potentially change the relevant information anyway. This means that relevant data is only written to the .aux file on the second LaTeX run, when biblatex has given up asking for a new Biber run.



The log files of your arXiv submission show that the arXiv only runs LaTeX twice, hence you get only 0s instead of the proper citation labels.



The relevant information for defernumbers lives in the .aux file. It might be possible to upload the .aux file to the arXiv as well (I'm not sure if they accept that or will automatically reject .aux uploads; uploaded .aux files might cause version or other package incompatibilities) in which case you would obtain the desired result after only one LaTeX run. This solution is more of a last resort.



A different and better solution would be to tell LaTeX not to ask for a Biber run at all when you upload a file to the arXiv. Just add



makeatletter
letblx@rerun@biberrelax
makeatother


to your preamble. Since the arXiv won't run Biber for you anyway, there is no point in having biblatex request a Biber run. In this instance we bypass a few tests that would block information subject to change after a Biber run from being written to the .aux file. In the end then two LaTeX runs should be enough for your citations to show up properly.






share|improve this answer












As confirmed in the comments your project uses defernumbers. With that option the label number for an entry is not assigned at the beginning of the document when the entry data is read from the .bbl file, instead the label number is assigned only once the entry is printed in the bibliography. Consider the following example with and without defernumbers



documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}

usepackage[style=numeric, defernumbers, backend=biber]{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}


begin{document}
cite{sigfridsson,moraux,worman,nussbaum,geer,cicero}
printbibliography[keyword=secondary]
printbibliography[notkeyword=secondary]
end{document}


For defernumbers to work properly the compilation cycle must include




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all cite keys are bold)

  2. Biber

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  4. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


If an appropriate .bbl is already present (i.e. if you compile the example from above as just described and then delete all files except the .tex and .bbl file) the compilation cycle still (perhaps unexpectedly) needs to include three LaTeX runs




  1. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  2. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations are 0)

  3. LaTeX (in the resulting PDF all citations show up)


That is because biblatex's heuristic to determine whether a Biber run is required will request a Biber run in the first LaTeX compilation. If a Biber run is requested, a few auxiliary bits are not written out to the .aux file in the anticipation that a subsequent requested Biber run could potentially change the relevant information anyway. This means that relevant data is only written to the .aux file on the second LaTeX run, when biblatex has given up asking for a new Biber run.



The log files of your arXiv submission show that the arXiv only runs LaTeX twice, hence you get only 0s instead of the proper citation labels.



The relevant information for defernumbers lives in the .aux file. It might be possible to upload the .aux file to the arXiv as well (I'm not sure if they accept that or will automatically reject .aux uploads; uploaded .aux files might cause version or other package incompatibilities) in which case you would obtain the desired result after only one LaTeX run. This solution is more of a last resort.



A different and better solution would be to tell LaTeX not to ask for a Biber run at all when you upload a file to the arXiv. Just add



makeatletter
letblx@rerun@biberrelax
makeatother


to your preamble. Since the arXiv won't run Biber for you anyway, there is no point in having biblatex request a Biber run. In this instance we bypass a few tests that would block information subject to change after a Biber run from being written to the .aux file. In the end then two LaTeX runs should be enough for your citations to show up properly.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 at 11:20









moewe

84.8k9108327




84.8k9108327












  • I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
    – saha rudra
    2 days ago










  • @saharudra Glad it worked!
    – moewe
    2 days ago


















  • I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
    – saha rudra
    2 days ago










  • @saharudra Glad it worked!
    – moewe
    2 days ago
















I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
– saha rudra
2 days ago




I used the solution proposed at the end which worked for me.
– saha rudra
2 days ago












@saharudra Glad it worked!
– moewe
2 days ago




@saharudra Glad it worked!
– moewe
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463556%2fall-the-citations-in-the-references-are-being-numbered-as-0-in-arxiv-while-upl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?