What was the “revolutionary” digital camera with infinite depth of field and focus adjustment in...












11














A few years ago (at least 10 years I believe), I read in a magazine about a "revolutionary" camera which was able to take pictures such that from one picture you could, afterwards, choose the point you wanted to focus on (during the post-processing).



I do not remember the name of that camera, I just recall it was in the shape of a cuboid (a rather long one) and (very vague memory) that it was black or red.



I could not find anything online but would be interested to see what it has become (and read about the technology - if it was not snake oil).










share|improve this question





























    11














    A few years ago (at least 10 years I believe), I read in a magazine about a "revolutionary" camera which was able to take pictures such that from one picture you could, afterwards, choose the point you wanted to focus on (during the post-processing).



    I do not remember the name of that camera, I just recall it was in the shape of a cuboid (a rather long one) and (very vague memory) that it was black or red.



    I could not find anything online but would be interested to see what it has become (and read about the technology - if it was not snake oil).










    share|improve this question



























      11












      11








      11







      A few years ago (at least 10 years I believe), I read in a magazine about a "revolutionary" camera which was able to take pictures such that from one picture you could, afterwards, choose the point you wanted to focus on (during the post-processing).



      I do not remember the name of that camera, I just recall it was in the shape of a cuboid (a rather long one) and (very vague memory) that it was black or red.



      I could not find anything online but would be interested to see what it has become (and read about the technology - if it was not snake oil).










      share|improve this question















      A few years ago (at least 10 years I believe), I read in a magazine about a "revolutionary" camera which was able to take pictures such that from one picture you could, afterwards, choose the point you wanted to focus on (during the post-processing).



      I do not remember the name of that camera, I just recall it was in the shape of a cuboid (a rather long one) and (very vague memory) that it was black or red.



      I could not find anything online but would be interested to see what it has become (and read about the technology - if it was not snake oil).







      history camera light-field lytro






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 15 '18 at 14:29









      muru

      1




      1










      asked Dec 14 '18 at 14:25









      WoJ

      1658




      1658






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          16














          I'm guessing you're referring to the Lytro by Lytro, Inc. It's an example of a light-field or plenoptic camera.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 11




            And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
            – Nic Hartley
            Dec 14 '18 at 17:43











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "61"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103542%2fwhat-was-the-revolutionary-digital-camera-with-infinite-depth-of-field-and-foc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          16














          I'm guessing you're referring to the Lytro by Lytro, Inc. It's an example of a light-field or plenoptic camera.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 11




            And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
            – Nic Hartley
            Dec 14 '18 at 17:43
















          16














          I'm guessing you're referring to the Lytro by Lytro, Inc. It's an example of a light-field or plenoptic camera.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 11




            And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
            – Nic Hartley
            Dec 14 '18 at 17:43














          16












          16








          16






          I'm guessing you're referring to the Lytro by Lytro, Inc. It's an example of a light-field or plenoptic camera.






          share|improve this answer












          I'm guessing you're referring to the Lytro by Lytro, Inc. It's an example of a light-field or plenoptic camera.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 14 '18 at 14:39









          Engineero

          31717




          31717








          • 11




            And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
            – Nic Hartley
            Dec 14 '18 at 17:43














          • 11




            And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
            – Nic Hartley
            Dec 14 '18 at 17:43








          11




          11




          And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
          – Nic Hartley
          Dec 14 '18 at 17:43




          And to add -- it wasn't snake oil, in that it did what it said it did (allowed for refocusing in postprocessing). The tech behind it is actually really cool. It was, however, not commercially successful.
          – Nic Hartley
          Dec 14 '18 at 17:43


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103542%2fwhat-was-the-revolutionary-digital-camera-with-infinite-depth-of-field-and-foc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?