How to prove an equivalence of two equations?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.



I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:



It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$



So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.



For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:



Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$



Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.



I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.



So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.



Could anyone please help?



Thanks



Best regards



Asg










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
    – Taladris
    Nov 19 at 7:44










  • Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 7:46















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.



I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:



It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$



So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.



For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:



Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$



Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.



I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.



So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.



Could anyone please help?



Thanks



Best regards



Asg










share|cite|improve this question
























  • What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
    – Taladris
    Nov 19 at 7:44










  • Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 7:46













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.



I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:



It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$



So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.



For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:



Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$



Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.



I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.



So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.



Could anyone please help?



Thanks



Best regards



Asg










share|cite|improve this question















Task:
Prove that . $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$ has a solution $s, t in mathbb{Z}$ iff $c$ is a multiple of $ gcd(a,b) $.



I’m not sure whether my proof is correct or not, so pleas have a look on it:



It’s to show that $s cdot a + t cdot b = c Leftrightarrow gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



$Rightarrow$”:
Hypothesis: $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$
Consequence: Then $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$



Proof: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = s cdot a + t cdot b$
$Leftrightarrow p = s cdot frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} + t cdot frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} = s cdot q + t cdot r$ such that $q = frac{a}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$ and $r = frac{b}{gcd(a, b)} in mathbb{Z}$



So there exists a $p in mathbb{Z}$ for the equation so the implication is shown.



For the proof of “$Leftarrow$” I’ll take a very similar way:



Hypothesis: $gcd(a,b) cdot p = c$
Consequence: Then $s cdot a + t cdot b = c$



Proof: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) cdot p$
From here are the steps identical to the previous proof.



I could also use the proposition of Bézout for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” which says: $s cdot a + t cdot b = gcd(a,b) $
Then I get for both proofs $p=1$.



So I’m not sure if my solution is correct, especially because the proofs for “$Rightarrow$” and “$Leftarrow$” are identical.



Could anyone please help?



Thanks



Best regards



Asg







proof-verification divisibility greatest-common-divisor






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 9:38

























asked Nov 19 at 7:41









Asg

84




84












  • What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
    – Taladris
    Nov 19 at 7:44










  • Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 7:46


















  • What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
    – Taladris
    Nov 19 at 7:44










  • Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 7:46
















What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44




What is ggT? Is it the same as gcd?
– Taladris
Nov 19 at 7:44












Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46




Yes, it was my mistake, I corrected now. Thanks!
– Asg
Nov 19 at 7:46










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










No, it is not correct. There are several issues.




  • You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$

  • The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 9:55











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004624%2fhow-to-prove-an-equivalence-of-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










No, it is not correct. There are several issues.




  • You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$

  • The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 9:55















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










No, it is not correct. There are several issues.




  • You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$

  • The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 9:55













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






No, it is not correct. There are several issues.




  • You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$

  • The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.






share|cite|improve this answer












No, it is not correct. There are several issues.




  • You wrote that what's to be proved is that$$stimes a + ttimes b = c iffgcd(a,b)times p = c.$$It is not. It is:$$(exists s,tinmathbb{Z}):stimes a+ttimes b=ciff(exists pinmathbb{Z}):gcd(a,b)times p=c.$$

  • The idea of the proof of $implies$ is correct. The proof of $Longleftarrow$ makes no sense. You cannot just say that “the steps are identical”. The goal is to prove that there are integers $s$ and $t$ such that $stimes a+ttimes b=c$ assuming that there is an integer $p$ such that $gcd(a,b)times p=c$. You did no such thing.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 at 8:26









José Carlos Santos

145k22115214




145k22115214












  • Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 9:55


















  • Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
    – Asg
    Nov 19 at 9:55
















Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55




Oh I see. Thank you for your quick help.
– Asg
Nov 19 at 9:55


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004624%2fhow-to-prove-an-equivalence-of-two-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?