Galois extension - minimum polynomial











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Let $K$ be a Galois extension of $F$ and let $ain K$. Let $n=[K:F]$, $r=[F(a):F]$, $G=text{Gal}(K/F)$ and $H=text{Gal}(K/F(a))$.



We symbolize with $tau_1, ldots , tau_r$ the representatives of the left cosets of $H$ in $G$.




  1. Show that $displaystyle{min (F,a)=prod_{i=1}^rleft (x-tau_i(a)right )}$.


  2. Show that $displaystyle{prod_{sigma in G}left (x- tau_i(a)right )=min (F,a)^{n/r}}$, where $tau_i$ is the unique representative such that $sigma in left[ tau_i right]$.



$$$$



Could you give me a hint how we could show these two points? I don't really have an idea.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $K$ be a Galois extension of $F$ and let $ain K$. Let $n=[K:F]$, $r=[F(a):F]$, $G=text{Gal}(K/F)$ and $H=text{Gal}(K/F(a))$.



    We symbolize with $tau_1, ldots , tau_r$ the representatives of the left cosets of $H$ in $G$.




    1. Show that $displaystyle{min (F,a)=prod_{i=1}^rleft (x-tau_i(a)right )}$.


    2. Show that $displaystyle{prod_{sigma in G}left (x- tau_i(a)right )=min (F,a)^{n/r}}$, where $tau_i$ is the unique representative such that $sigma in left[ tau_i right]$.



    $$$$



    Could you give me a hint how we could show these two points? I don't really have an idea.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $K$ be a Galois extension of $F$ and let $ain K$. Let $n=[K:F]$, $r=[F(a):F]$, $G=text{Gal}(K/F)$ and $H=text{Gal}(K/F(a))$.



      We symbolize with $tau_1, ldots , tau_r$ the representatives of the left cosets of $H$ in $G$.




      1. Show that $displaystyle{min (F,a)=prod_{i=1}^rleft (x-tau_i(a)right )}$.


      2. Show that $displaystyle{prod_{sigma in G}left (x- tau_i(a)right )=min (F,a)^{n/r}}$, where $tau_i$ is the unique representative such that $sigma in left[ tau_i right]$.



      $$$$



      Could you give me a hint how we could show these two points? I don't really have an idea.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $K$ be a Galois extension of $F$ and let $ain K$. Let $n=[K:F]$, $r=[F(a):F]$, $G=text{Gal}(K/F)$ and $H=text{Gal}(K/F(a))$.



      We symbolize with $tau_1, ldots , tau_r$ the representatives of the left cosets of $H$ in $G$.




      1. Show that $displaystyle{min (F,a)=prod_{i=1}^rleft (x-tau_i(a)right )}$.


      2. Show that $displaystyle{prod_{sigma in G}left (x- tau_i(a)right )=min (F,a)^{n/r}}$, where $tau_i$ is the unique representative such that $sigma in left[ tau_i right]$.



      $$$$



      Could you give me a hint how we could show these two points? I don't really have an idea.







      abstract-algebra field-theory galois-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 29 at 14:46









      Bilo

      1089




      1089










      asked Nov 19 at 23:09









      Mary Star

      2,92082266




      2,92082266






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          For the first point, try to show that if $i neq j$, then $tau_i(a) neq tau_j(a)$.



          For the second one, try to show that if $sigma, tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a) = tau(a)$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Do I have to write a full proof?
            – Bilo
            Nov 23 at 20:39










          • For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 8:38






          • 1




            Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 14:57












          • Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 16:41






          • 1




            Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 17:19













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005655%2fgalois-extension-minimum-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          For the first point, try to show that if $i neq j$, then $tau_i(a) neq tau_j(a)$.



          For the second one, try to show that if $sigma, tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a) = tau(a)$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Do I have to write a full proof?
            – Bilo
            Nov 23 at 20:39










          • For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 8:38






          • 1




            Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 14:57












          • Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 16:41






          • 1




            Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 17:19

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          For the first point, try to show that if $i neq j$, then $tau_i(a) neq tau_j(a)$.



          For the second one, try to show that if $sigma, tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a) = tau(a)$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Do I have to write a full proof?
            – Bilo
            Nov 23 at 20:39










          • For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 8:38






          • 1




            Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 14:57












          • Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 16:41






          • 1




            Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 17:19















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          For the first point, try to show that if $i neq j$, then $tau_i(a) neq tau_j(a)$.



          For the second one, try to show that if $sigma, tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a) = tau(a)$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          For the first point, try to show that if $i neq j$, then $tau_i(a) neq tau_j(a)$.



          For the second one, try to show that if $sigma, tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a) = tau(a)$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 23 at 12:52









          Bilo

          1089




          1089








          • 1




            Do I have to write a full proof?
            – Bilo
            Nov 23 at 20:39










          • For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 8:38






          • 1




            Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 14:57












          • Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 16:41






          • 1




            Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 17:19
















          • 1




            Do I have to write a full proof?
            – Bilo
            Nov 23 at 20:39










          • For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 8:38






          • 1




            Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 14:57












          • Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
            – Mary Star
            Nov 24 at 16:41






          • 1




            Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
            – Bilo
            Nov 24 at 17:19










          1




          1




          Do I have to write a full proof?
          – Bilo
          Nov 23 at 20:39




          Do I have to write a full proof?
          – Bilo
          Nov 23 at 20:39












          For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
          – Mary Star
          Nov 24 at 8:38




          For the first part: Do they have to be different because the number of the left costes is equal to the extension degree $[F(a):F]$ ?
          – Mary Star
          Nov 24 at 8:38




          1




          1




          Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
          – Bilo
          Nov 24 at 14:57






          Yes, since $tau_i$ maps a root of a polynomial into a root of the same polynomial. With this claim you can show that $tau_i(a)$ define all' the roots of $min(F,a)$, since it's degree is exactly $r$, so It must have the form you have described above
          – Bilo
          Nov 24 at 14:57














          Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
          – Mary Star
          Nov 24 at 16:41




          Ah ok!! Could you explain to me also further the second point?
          – Mary Star
          Nov 24 at 16:41




          1




          1




          Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
          – Bilo
          Nov 24 at 17:19






          Yes, for sure. First show that if $sigma,tau$ belong to the same class modulo $H$, then $sigma(a)=tau(a)$; Since $vert G:H vert = r$, each coset contains exacly $frac{n}{r}$ elements. Denote with $C_1,...,C_r$ the distinct cosets of $G$ modulo $H$., then begin{align} prod_{sigma in G}(x-tau_i(a)) &= prod_{sigma in C_1}(x-tau_1(a)) cdots prod_{sigma in C_r}(x-tau_r(a)) \ &= (x-tau_1(a))^{n/r} cdots (x-tau_r(a))^{n/r} \ &= (prod_{1}^r(x-tau_i(a)) )^{n/r} \ &= min(F,a)^{n/r} end{align} Hope it's clear.
          – Bilo
          Nov 24 at 17:19




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005655%2fgalois-extension-minimum-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?