$ex leq e^x$ inequality using derivatives
$begingroup$
So I was going through a sum for
Prove $ex leq e^x$ , $forall x in mathbb{R} $
I took $g(x) = e^x - ex$
Then $g'(x)= e^x - e$
I understood the case when $x>1$ function is strictly increasing i.e $g'(x) >0$ then $e^x>ex$ but what about when $x leq 1$
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I was going through a sum for
Prove $ex leq e^x$ , $forall x in mathbb{R} $
I took $g(x) = e^x - ex$
Then $g'(x)= e^x - e$
I understood the case when $x>1$ function is strictly increasing i.e $g'(x) >0$ then $e^x>ex$ but what about when $x leq 1$
calculus
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I was going through a sum for
Prove $ex leq e^x$ , $forall x in mathbb{R} $
I took $g(x) = e^x - ex$
Then $g'(x)= e^x - e$
I understood the case when $x>1$ function is strictly increasing i.e $g'(x) >0$ then $e^x>ex$ but what about when $x leq 1$
calculus
$endgroup$
So I was going through a sum for
Prove $ex leq e^x$ , $forall x in mathbb{R} $
I took $g(x) = e^x - ex$
Then $g'(x)= e^x - e$
I understood the case when $x>1$ function is strictly increasing i.e $g'(x) >0$ then $e^x>ex$ but what about when $x leq 1$
calculus
calculus
asked Nov 24 '18 at 16:29
Sumukh SaiSumukh Sai
206
206
3
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45
3
3
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
it is easy to see $x=1$ is the absolute minimum, that is, $ f(1)leq f(x)$ for all $xin R$ so that $0leq ex-e^x$.Thus $exleq e^x$ for all $xin R.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that
$$g(x)=e^x-ex implies g'(x)=e^x-e=0quad x=1$$
moreover $g''(x)=e^x > 0$, therefore $x=1$ is a point of minimum for $g(x)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011758%2fex-leq-ex-inequality-using-derivatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
it is easy to see $x=1$ is the absolute minimum, that is, $ f(1)leq f(x)$ for all $xin R$ so that $0leq ex-e^x$.Thus $exleq e^x$ for all $xin R.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is easy to see $x=1$ is the absolute minimum, that is, $ f(1)leq f(x)$ for all $xin R$ so that $0leq ex-e^x$.Thus $exleq e^x$ for all $xin R.$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is easy to see $x=1$ is the absolute minimum, that is, $ f(1)leq f(x)$ for all $xin R$ so that $0leq ex-e^x$.Thus $exleq e^x$ for all $xin R.$
$endgroup$
it is easy to see $x=1$ is the absolute minimum, that is, $ f(1)leq f(x)$ for all $xin R$ so that $0leq ex-e^x$.Thus $exleq e^x$ for all $xin R.$
answered Nov 24 '18 at 17:07
gb2017gb2017
944
944
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that
$$g(x)=e^x-ex implies g'(x)=e^x-e=0quad x=1$$
moreover $g''(x)=e^x > 0$, therefore $x=1$ is a point of minimum for $g(x)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that
$$g(x)=e^x-ex implies g'(x)=e^x-e=0quad x=1$$
moreover $g''(x)=e^x > 0$, therefore $x=1$ is a point of minimum for $g(x)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that
$$g(x)=e^x-ex implies g'(x)=e^x-e=0quad x=1$$
moreover $g''(x)=e^x > 0$, therefore $x=1$ is a point of minimum for $g(x)$.
$endgroup$
We have that
$$g(x)=e^x-ex implies g'(x)=e^x-e=0quad x=1$$
moreover $g''(x)=e^x > 0$, therefore $x=1$ is a point of minimum for $g(x)$.
edited Nov 24 '18 at 17:25
answered Nov 24 '18 at 16:57
gimusigimusi
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011758%2fex-leq-ex-inequality-using-derivatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Then the function is decreasing. That's all you need. Think about it for a moment.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 24 '18 at 16:32
$begingroup$
Just re-wording what @saulspatz says: what does it mean for a function to have only one minima or maxima? Write it as inequality
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Nov 24 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I'm still getting a bit confused
$endgroup$
– Sumukh Sai
Nov 24 '18 at 16:45